Research ArticleMACROPHAGES

M2-like, dermal macrophages are maintained via IL-4/CCL24–mediated cooperative interaction with eosinophils in cutaneous leishmaniasis

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Immunology  10 Apr 2020:
Vol. 5, Issue 46, eaaz4415
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaz4415

Tight tissue associations

The intracellular pathogen Leishmania major has been found to replicate in dermal tissue-resident macrophages (TRMs) that have an M2-like phenotype, but L. major also promotes a strong TH1 immune environment. Here, Lee et al. show that dermal TRMs can maintain an M2 phenotype in this TH1 environment through IL-4/CCL24–mediated interactions with eosinophils. Eosinophils were identified as the main source of IL-4 that drove local proliferation of dermal TRMs with M2 properties. IL-4 and IL-10 stimulation of dermal TRMs triggered production of CCL24, which promoted further eosinophil recruitment and close interactions with TRMs. These observations provide insight into this intercellular interaction that may have relevance to other inflammatory conditions.

Abstract

Tissue-resident macrophages (TRMs) maintain tissue homeostasis, but they can also provide a replicative niche for intracellular pathogens such as Leishmania. How dermal TRMs proliferate and maintain their M2 properties even in the strong TH1 environment of the L. major infected dermis is not clear. Here, we show that, in infected mice lacking IL-4/13 from eosinophils, dermal TRMs shifted to a proinflammatory state, their numbers declined, and disease was attenuated. Intravital microscopy revealed a rapid infiltration of eosinophils followed by their tight interaction with dermal TRMs. IL-4–stimulated dermal TRMs, in concert with IL-10, produced a large amount of CCL24, which functioned to amplify eosinophil influx and their interaction with dermal TRMs. An intraperitoneal helminth infection model also demonstrated a requirement for eosinophil-derived IL-4 to maintain tissue macrophages through a CCL24-mediated amplification loop. CCL24 secretion was confined to resident macrophages in other tissues, implicating eosinophil-TRM cooperative interactions in diverse inflammatory settings.

INTRODUCTION

Most tissues are populated by tissue-resident macrophages (TRM) that perform anatomical niche-specific roles to help maintain tissue homeostasis, integrity, and function (1, 2). It is now understood that all TRMs at birth are embryonically seeded but are gradually replaced by hematopoietic stem cell–derived progenitors with age to a greater [intestine and major histocompatibility complex II–high (MHCIIhigh) dermal macrophages], lesser (heart and pancreas), or negligible (brain, epidermis, lung, and liver) extent (3). Their ontogeny and tissue-specific cues contribute to the heterogeneity of TRMs (4, 5). Despite their functional diversity, TRMs in certain settings have been classified as alternatively activated (M2-like) cells with fundamental roles in the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair (1, 6). Embryonic-derived cardiac TRMs, for example, drive cardiomyocyte proliferation and angiogenesis after sterile heart injury, whereas monocyte-derived cells exhibit proinflammatory activities (7, 8). In a helminth-bacterial coinfection model, the functional plasticity of the nematode-expanded, peritoneal TRMs was limited when compared with monocytes (9). In the lung, embryonic-derived alveolar macrophages were shown to have M2-like characteristics that better supported the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis compared with monocyte-derived interstitial macrophages (10). Similarly, we have reported that M2-like, embryonic-derived MHCIIlow dermal TRMs better support the growth of Leishmania major compared with monocyte-derived cells and can be preferentially infected by certain strains of L. major to produce nonhealing lesions in conventionally resistant C57BL/6 mice (11).

Whereas most innate cells accumulate in the blood during inflammation, embryonic-derived TRMs can increase their population density beyond homeostatic levels through a distinct mechanism that involves interleukin-4 (IL-4)– or IL-13–mediated self-proliferation, first described in the context of helminth-driven T helper 2 (TH2) pathology (12, 13). A more recent study showed that IL-4/13, together with recognition of apoptotic cells by TRMs, was required to induce their local proliferation in the lung after helminth infection or in the gut after induction of colitis (14). We also demonstrated a role for IL-4 in the local proliferation of M2-like dermal macrophages, exceptional in this case because it functioned in the context of the strong TH1 immune environment characteristically seen in L. major–infected C57BL/6 mice (11). The type 2 cytokines required for the maintenance of TRMs has been investigated in adipose tissue, with IL-4 and eosinophils shown to sustain alternatively activated macrophages, although whether or not eosinophils provide an essential source of IL-4 was not addressed (15, 16). Our understanding of the maintenance of TRMs under pathological conditions, such as infection, is still limited and has yet to be investigated in the skin.

Eosinophils are terminally differentiated, granule-containing effector cells mainly involved in helminth infection and allergy. These cells are now considered as tissue-resident leukocytes having broad tissue distribution and homeostatic functions, such as tissue development/regeneration and metabolic/immune homeostasis (17). IL-5 and eotaxins have been recognized as important regulators of eosinophil differentiation and tissue accumulation (18). In particular, IL-5 produced by type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) and eotaxin-1 are critical for steady-state homing of eosinophils into the small intestine (19, 20). The signals that regulate eosinophils homing to the steady-state dermis are not known. In vitro–generated macrophages from monocytes and bone marrow (BM) were shown to be potent producers of eotaxin-2 after IL-4 and IL-10 stimulation, and exogenous IL-4–activated macrophages promoted CCR3-dependent eosinophilia in filarial helminth–infected mice (21), suggesting that tissue myeloid cells could be the source of eotaxins regulating the homing and functions of tissue-dwelling eosinophils (22, 23).

In this study, we document a cooperative interaction between eosinophils and TRMs in the L. major–infected dermis. During infection, eosinophils are the major source of IL-4 required to mediate the local proliferation of dermal TRMs and to maintain their M2-like phenotype. The IL-4–stimulated dermal TRMs, in concert with IL-10, produce high amounts of CC chemokine ligand 24 (CCL24) that amplifies the recruitment of eosinophils and their interaction with TRMs. Intravital imaging confirmed their tight cellular association, which was dampened by CCL24 neutralization. The production of CCL24 was confined to TRMs in other tissues, suggesting that eosinophil-TRM cooperative interactions can be generalized to other tissues and inflammatory settings.

RESULTS

IL-4 competency in innate cells is required for maintaining dermal TRMs during L. major infection

We previously reported that IL-4 maintains dermal TRMs as replicative niches for L. major by inducing their local proliferation during TH1 immunity (11). To identify the nature (innate versus adaptive) of the cellular source of IL-4, we generated mixed BM chimeras with selective IL-4 competency within the hematopoietic compartment (Fig. 1A). Reconstitution of lethally irradiated il4−/− mice with a 4:1 mixture of CD45.1+ rag1−/− and CD45.2+ il4−/− BM cells (BMCs) yielded mice with IL-4 competency solely in innate cells (rag1−/− + il4−/− → il4−/− chimeras; hereafter referred to as “innate” IL-4+ chimeras). Conversely, reconstitution of il4−/− mice with a 4:1 mixture of CD45.2+ rag1−/−il4−/− and wild-type (WT) BMCs produced chimeras with IL-4 competent T and B lymphocytes but a predominantly IL-4 incompetent innate immune compartment (rag1−/−il4−/− + WT → il4−/− chimeras; “adaptive” IL-4+ chimeras). Control chimeras with IL-4 competency in both innate and adaptive compartments (WT → il4−/− chimeras; “both” IL-4+ innate and adaptive chimeras) or neither compartment (il4−/− → il4−/− chimeras; “neither” IL-4+ innate or adaptive chimeras) was also generated. The expected reconstitutions of mixed chimeras generated using this approach were confirmed by CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic markers staining of ear isolates (Fig. 1B). As we previously reported, most of the dermal macrophages were radioresistant, not replaced by BMCs, and remained of host origin.

Fig. 1 Innate cells are the source of IL-4 to maintain dermal TRMs during L. major infection.

(A) Transplantation strategy used to generate mixed BM chimeras with selective IL-4 competency within innate or adaptive compartments. BM cells mixed in a ratio of 4:1 were transferred to irradiated recipients. (B) Mixed BM chimeras (n = 4 to 6) with selective IL-4 expression in innate or adaptive immune cells were generated by reconstitution of irradiated CD45.2+ il4−/− mice with various mixtures of BM cells from CD45.1+ WT, CD45.2+ il4−/−, CD45.1+ rag1−/−, and CD45.2+ rag1−/−il4−/− mice, as described in Results. PMNs, polymorphonuclear leukocytes. (C) The absolute numbers of myeloid subsets recovered from ears of mixed BM chimeras at day 12 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd. The gating strategy is depicted in fig. S1. (D) Lesion development and pathology scores over the course of infection with 103 LmSd metacyclic promastigotes in the ear dermis of WT, il4−/−, and mixed BM chimeras (n = 4 to 6). Parasite burdens were quantified at 12 weeks p.i. (E). Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest compared with both chimeras (C to E). Data are representative of two independent experiments (B to E).

When infected with nonhealing L. major Seidman strain (LmSd), neither IL-4+ mice showed significantly decreased number of dermal TRMs compared with both IL-4+ chimeras, confirming the role of IL-4 for their expansion during infection (Fig. 1C). The number of infiltrating eosinophils was also significantly reduced in neither IL-4+ chimeras. We found a similar decrease of both dermal TRMs and eosinophils in mixed BM chimeras with IL-4 competency largely restricted to the adaptive immune compartment. By contrast, the innate IL-4+ chimeras maintained their numbers of dermal TRMs and eosinophils during infection. The adaptive as well as “neither” IL-4+ chimeras showed increased infiltration of inflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes and/or moDCs compared to “both” or innate IL-4+ chimeras (Fig. 1C and fig. S1). When challenged with a low dose of LmSd, both and innate IL-4+ chimeric mice developed nonhealing, ulcerative lesions similar to C57BL/6 WT mice, whereas lesion progression, pathology, and parasite burdens were substantially ameliorated in neither and adaptive IL-4+ chimeric mice, as well as in il4−/− mice (Fig. 1, D and E).

Eosinophils are a critical source of IL-4 to maintain dermal TRMs during L. major infection

Because neither intracellular cytokine staining for IL-4 nor cytokine measurements by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed us to detect IL-4 production by ear lesional cells from LmSd-infected mice (11), we used IL-4 dual reporter mice (4get × KN2), which permit the simultaneous analysis of cells that are enhanced green fluorescent protein–positive (eGFP+) for IL-4 transcription and positive for recent IL-4 protein secretion by staining for human CD2 (24). As expected, the frequency of IL-4–secreting cells among the live cells recovered from the ear was extremely low, 4.64% hCD2+ of 4.38% green fluorescent protein–positive (GFP+) cells or 0.2% in total (Fig. 2A). Of these, about 20% were identified as eosinophils and 30% as CD4+ T cells. CD90.2+CD2+CD3− cells, most likely ILC2s, and CD11b+FcεRIα+ basophils were also hCD2 and GFP+ (fig. S2). Because the results of the BM chimeras implicated innate cells as a critical source of IL-4 to maintain dermal TRMs, we looked specifically at the number of dermal TRMs in anti-SiglecF antibody (Ab)–treated, eosinophil-depleted animals during the course of infection (Fig. 2B). The number of dermal TRMs was reduced by more than half in the eosinophil-depleted mice, whereas more inflammatory moDCs and CD4+ T cells were recovered from the lesion at 12 days postinfection (p.i.). The reduction of dermal TRMs in eosinophil-depleted animals was comparable to that observed in il4−/− animals, and eosinophil depletion in il4−/− mice had no further effect on reducing the number of these cells (Fig. 2C). Similar results were observed in mice lacking IL-5, which is a key mediator of eosinophil maturation and release in the BM (Fig. 2D). Similar to IL-4–deficient mice, il5−/− mice showed smaller lesions and reduced pathology compared with WT mice (Fig. 2E). By intracellular cytokine staining, we identified ILC2 as the main source of IL-5 and IL-13, whereas αβ T cells were the main producers of IL-10 and IL-13 (Fig. 2F).

Fig. 2 IL-4 production by eosinophils is necessary to maintain dermal TRMs during L. major infection.

(A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing eGFP+ and hCD2+ cells from IL-4 dual reporter mice (4get/KN2) at day 12 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd. (B and C) The absolute numbers of lymphoid and myeloid subsets (B) or dermal macrophages (C) recovered from eosinophils-depleted animals using anti-SiglecF Abs at day 12 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd. NKs, natural killer cells; Ts, T cells. (D) The absolute numbers of myeloid subsets recovered from il5−/− mice at day 12 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd. cDCs, conventional dendritic cells. (E) Lesion development and pathology scores over the course of infection with 103 LmSd metacyclic promastigotes in the ear dermis of C57BL/6, il4−/−, and Il5−/− mice (n = 6 to 10). (F) Intracellular staining of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 from indicated populations of ear dermal cells recovered from mice (n = 6) infected with 2 × 105 LmSd for 12 days. (G) The absolute numbers of myeloid subsets recovered from WT, eoCre il4/13f/f, and il4−/− mice at day 12 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd. (H) Ki67 expression or BrdU incorporation by dermal TRMs from naïve or infected WT and eoCre il4/13f/f mice at 12 days p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd (n = 4 to 6). (I) Lesion development and pathology scores over the course of infection with 103 LmSd metacyclic promastigotes in the ear dermis of WT, eoCre il4/13f/f, and il4−/− mice (n = 6 to 10). (J) Parasite burdens were measured at week 12 p.i. (K) Parasite burdens in WT, il4/13f/f, and il4−/− mice were measured at week 5 p.i. with 103 LmSd metacyclic promastigotes (n = 6). (L) Measurement of footpad thickness over the course of infection with 106 LmSd metacyclic promastigotes in the footpads of WT (n = 5) and eoCre il4/13f/f (n = 4). For reference, the side view of footpads at 5 weeks p.i. is shown in bottom panel. (M) Parasite burdens were measured at week 5 p.i. Values represent means +/− SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (B, D, H, L, and M) and by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest compared with IgG control (C) or WT infected with LmSd (E, G, I, J, and K). Data are representative of two independent experiments (A to G, I, and J).

To confirm eosinophils as a critical source of IL-4, mice expressing Cre protein under the control of the endogenous eosinophil peroxidase promoter (eoCre) were crossed to il4/13f/f mice to obtain a selective deficiency of IL-4 (and IL-13) in eosinophils (25, 26). The resulting eoCre il4/13f/f mice displayed a reduction in the number of lesional eosinophils and dermal TRMs similar to il4−/− animals, whereas they showed increased infiltration of Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes (Fig. 2G). At day 12 p.i., dermal TRMs exhibited a two- to threefold increase in the frequencies of Ki67+ and 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine–positive (BrdU+) cells compared with naïve animals. These increased frequencies of dividing cells during infection were abrogated in the eoCre il4/13f/f mice, demonstrating that the expansion of dermal TRMs depends on IL-4 from eosinophils (Fig. 2H). Furthermore, the eoCre il4/13f/f mice ameliorated ear lesion progression and pathology identical to il4−/− mice (Fig. 2I) and controlled parasite burdens at least as well, with a 30-fold reduction compared with WT mice at 12 weeks p.i. (Fig. 2J). In an independent experiment in which the mice were sacrificed at 5 weeks p.i., the eoCre il4/13f/f mice showed fourfold lower parasite burdens compared with WT and il4/13f/f mice (Fig. 2K). The eoCre il4/13f/f mice also showed less footpad swelling and 40-fold lower parasite burdens compared with WT mice at 5 weeks after subcutaneous challenge in the footpad (Fig. 2, L and M).

IL-4/10–stimulated dermal TRMs secrete CCL24 to recruit eosinophils

Stained tissue sections from a lesion revealed significant infiltration of eosinophils around dermal macrophages harboring parasites at day 12 p.i. (Fig. 3A, insets 1 and 3, and movie S1). Eosinophils also infiltrated into a proximal region across the auricular cartilage, opposite to the side of parasite inoculation, and they were tightly associated with dermal TRMs even in the absence of parasites (Fig. 3A, insets 1 and 4, and movie S2). Quantitatively, more than 80% of eosinophils interacted with dermal TRMs in the proximal area of the injection site compared with roughly 55% in either naïve ear or nonproximal region of the infected ear (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3 CCL24 produced by dermal macrophages mediates in vitro interaction with eosinophils.

(A) Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy on vertical sections of an infected ear showing LmSd-RFP (white), SiglecF (green), MR (magenta), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue). Images in 1 to 4 show boxed areas at higher magnification. (B) Percentages of eosinophils interacting with dermal macrophages in naïve, noninflamed, and inflamed regions (n = 6) of ear at 8 days p.i. with 2 × 105 RFP+ LmSd. (C) Transwell migration of eosinophils from upper to lower chamber containing BMDM-treated or nontreated for 72 hours with IL-4, IL-10, or IL-4/10 compared with cytokine-only controls (n = 6). (D) Transwell migration of eosinophils from upper to lower chamber containing BMDM treated or nontreated with either IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IL-4/10, or IL-4/13 compared with cytokine-only controls and infected or uninfected with LmSd (n = 4). (E) Chemokine array from supernatants of BMDM-treated or nontreated for 72 hours with either IL-4, IL-10, or IL-4/10 (n = 6). (F) The number of migrating eosinophils from upper to lower chamber containing IL-4/10–treated BMDMs in the presence of increasing concentrations of anti-CCL24–neutralizing Abs (n = 6). (G) Representative in vitro live imaging and quantification of interactions between cocultured eosinophils (red), neutrophils (green), and IL-4/10–stimulated BMDMs (purple) treated with anti-CCL24 Ab or control IgG. (H) Chemokine array from supernatants of dermal macrophages and monocytes/moDCs sorted from naïve WT mice and mice (n = 4) treated for 72 hours with IL-4, IL-10, or IL-4/10. (I and J) Representative dot plots and graphs showing the percent of dermal TRMs with intracellular staining of CCL24 in mice (n = 4 to 6) infected with 2 × 105 LmSd-GFP. (K) The number of eosinophils at days 2 and 4 p.i. with 2 × 105 LmSd in WT mice (n = 4) treated with anti-CCL24 Ab or control IgG. Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (F, G, and K) and by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest compared with nontreated (C, E, and H), naïve (I), or WT (J). Data are representative of more than five (A and B) and two (C and K) independent experiments.

To investigate whether macrophages directly attract eosinophils upon stimulation, we measured eosinophils transmigration into chambers containing BM-derived macrophages (BMDMs) pretreated with type 2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-10, or IL-4/10, which we previously reported as necessary cytokines to maintain dermal TRMs during L. major infection (11). When incubated with IL-4/10, BMDMs induced about 2.6-fold increase in the transmigration of eosinophils compared with the respective cytokines without BMDM (Fig. 3C). IL-13 had no effect, and LmSd infection of the BMDMs did not alter the eosinophil transmigration compared with treatment of BMDMs with cytokines alone (Fig. 3D). Strikingly, a chemokine array using supernatants from the treated BMDMs demonstrated that IL-4/10 stimulation significantly up-regulated the production of a single chemokine, CCL24, also known as eotaxin-2, up to 540 pg/ml (Fig. 3E). Neutralizing Abs against CCL24 decreased eosinophil transmigration into wells containing IL-4/10–stimulated BMDMs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3F). Live imaging of cultures containing eosinophils, neutrophils, and IL-4/10–stimulated BMDMs revealed the selective association of dermal TRMs and eosinophils (Fig. 3G and movies S3 and S4). During a 4-hour incubation, eosinophils showed increasing degrees of interactions with BMDMs in contrast to neutrophils. CCL24 neutralization significantly diminished these interactions, whereas the neutrophil interactions with BMDMs were slightly increased.

To address whether dermal TRMs secrete CCL24 upon cytokine stimulation, we sorted and stimulated dermal TRMs, Ly6Chi monocytes, and Ly6Cint/lo moDCs ex vivo (Fig. 3H). Dermal TRMs produced a large amount of CCL24 exclusively in response to IL-4/10. No up-regulation of the other chemokines was detected, and we were unable to detect CCL24 secretion from monocytes or monocyte-derived cells. These data are consistent with transcriptional profiles of dermal myeloid cells deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession number GSE49358), which showed that MHCII+/− dermal TRMs express significantly higher levels of Ccl24 in comparison to the other myeloid cells (fig. S3). We also detected increased in vivo production of CCL24 in dermal TRMs beginning at 5 days p.i. (Fig. 3I), which was significantly reduced in il4−/− and eoCre il4/13f/f mice (Fig. 3J). There was significantly decreased eosinophil recruitment after in vivo CCL24 neutralization, confirming its essential role in the intralesional accumulation of these cells (Fig. 3K).

Eosinophils colocalize with dermal TRMs in the steady state

To visualize the association of dermal TRMs and eosinophils in vivo during steady state, we performed intravital imaging [intravital microscopy (IVM)] on the upper dermis using Manocept labeling, previously shown to selectively bind the mannose receptor on the surface of dermal TRMs (11). Nonmigratory, perivascular dermal TRMs were readily visible within 1 hour after Manocept injection (Fig. 4A and movie S5) and showed active, continuous morphological changes involving rapid protrusion of pseudopods (Fig. 4B and movies S6 and S7).

Fig. 4 Eosinophils show stable interaction with dermal TRMs in steady state.

(A and B) IVM time-lapse image from the ear of a C57BL/6 mouse injected with Manocept Alexa 488 to label MRhi dermal TRMs and Evans blue for blood vessels. Data are representative of more than 10 independent mouse experiments. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots showing tdTomato+ eosinophils from eoCre ROSA-LSL-tdTomato reporter mouse. FSA, forward scatter. (D) Image obtained from an IVM of the ear of naïve eoCre ROSA-LSL-tdTomato reporter mouse. Areas devoid of TRMs are demarcated by dotted lines. (E) IVM images from the ears of a naïve eoCre ROSA-LSL-tdTomato mouse. Panel-labeled “tracks” show the paths followed by tdTomato+ eosinophils more than 50 min. Bottom-panels labeled as “1” and “2” are time-lapse images from boxed region in the top left panel. (F to H) Violin plots showing the average speed, migration distance, and mean duration of contact (with dermal TRMs) of eosinophils. Stratification of the cells according to their bimodal distribution of average speed (colored red or black) was applied to the other behavior parameters. Data are representative of more than four independent mouse experiments (D to H). (I) The number of eosinophils in ear and peripheral blood in mice (n = 4) after administration of either isotype control or anti-CCL24 Abs for three consecutive days. Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05 by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (I). Data are representative of two independent experiments (I).

For visualizing eosinophils, we crossed eoCre mice with ROSA26-LSL-tdTomato reporter mice that express robust tdTomato fluorescence after Cre-mediated recombination. tdTomato+ cells recovered from the skin of naïve animals were virtually all CD11b+SiglecF+Ly6G− eosinophils (Fig. 4C). Combining intravital microscopy with eoCre reporter mice revealed low numbers of eosinophils patrolling normal skin (Fig. 4, D and E), as previously described (27). Low-magnification IVM imaging of Manocept-labeled tissue indicated that the dermal TRMs were not evenly distributed throughout the ear dermis and that the tissue-resident eosinophils were largely confined to areas populated by dermal TRMs (Figs. 3A and 4D). More than 50% of eosinophils in the steady state continuously interacted with or were in close proximity to dermal TRMs (Fig. 4E, insets 1 and 2, and movie S8). This was reflected in the bimodal distribution of various parameters, including the instantaneous velocity of crawling eosinophils (0.02 to 18 μm/s; mean, 0.059 μm/s; Fig. 4F), the migration distance (mean of 24.65 μm during 1-hour imaging; Fig. 4G), and the duration of contact (mean, 778 s; Fig. 4H). The speed and migration distance of the eosinophils were inversely correlated with their contact duration with dermal TRMs.

To test the possibility that CCL24 is produced to control eosinophil migration into the steady-state dermis, we neutralized CCL24 and monitored the change in eosinophil numbers. CCL24 neutralization significantly reduced the number of dermal eosinophils while resulting in blood eosinophilia (Fig. 4I).

CCL24 regulates eosinophil migration, morphology, and interaction with dermal TRMs during L. major infection

As we previously reported (11), a progressive infiltration of eosinophils into the inoculation site was observed during the first 6 days of infection (fig. S4). Because the number of eosinophils at day 6 p.i. exceeded the capability of the imaging software to track individual eosinophils, we focused on earlier events to visualize the behavior of these cells. As early as an hour after challenge with 104 LmSd, eosinophils began to localize around the injection site (Fig. 5A and movies S9 and S10). The average speed and migration distance of eosinophils at 1 hour p.i. were significantly increased compared with the steady state, 0.102 μm/s and 96.8 μm versus 0.059 μm/s and 24.6 μm, respectively (Figs. 4, F and G, and 5, C and D). Compared with steady state, the eosinophils at 1 hour p.i. were also in shorter duration contact with dermal TRMs, 115 s versus 778 s (Figs. 4H and 5F), with highly fluctuating areas of colocalization between the cells (Fig. 5G, left). CCL24 neutralization failed to change any early behavior of the eosinophils, suggesting that other factors related to the tissue damage and mechanical stress associated to the needle injection might control the immediate behavior of eosinophils at the site.

Fig. 5 CCL24 promotes eosinophil migration, morphological changes, and interaction with dermal TRMs during infection.

(A and B) IVM images from the ears of eoCre ROSA-LSL-tdTomato mice infected intradermally with 1 × 104 LmSd and treated with CCL24-neutralizing Abs or control IgG. Panels labeled as tracks show the paths followed by tdTomato+ eosinophils more than 50 min. The areas devoid of dermal TRMs are demarcated by dotted lines. (C to G) Eosinophil average speed of movement, migration distance, sphericity, mean duration of contact with dermal TRMs, and average of colocalization with dermal TRMs were analyzed from IVM images represented in (A) and (B). The numbers in (C) indicate the total number of trackable eosinophils in one field of view. Surface rendered eosinophils at day 3 p.i. were plotted in right panel of (E) in order of low to high sphericity. Values represent means ± SD. **P < 0.01 by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (E and F) to compare two samples. Data are representative of three independent experiments (A to G).

After 3 days, eosinophils in both groups became sessile, shown as significantly decreased average speed (Fig. 5, B and C, and movies S11 and S12). Several lines of evidence suggested that CCL24 produced by the dermal TRMs was involved in the migration and phenotypic changes of eosinophils at this time. First, the number of tracked eosinophils in the field of view was threefold fewer in CCL24-neutralized animals compared with immunoglobulin G (IgG) controls (21 versus 65 tracked eosinophils; Fig. 5C). This was reflected in the reduced total number of ear dermis eosinophils in the CCL24-neutralized mice quantified by flow analysis at days 2 and 4 p.i. (Fig. 3K). Note that while the number of eosinophils tracked by the imaging software appeared greater at 1 hour compared with 3 days, this reflects an overestimate at the early time point due to cells migrating in and out of the imaging plane and being counted multiple times. Second, while dermal eosinophils in the control mice displayed an activated morphology with irregular shapes, multiple pseudopods, and spreading, eosinophils in CCL24-neutralized mice assumed a more uniformly smaller size and more rounded shape, which was quantified by measuring how much the shape approximates a sphere (Fig. 5E). Third, the average contact duration and area between eosinophils and dermal TRMs in a CCL24-neutralized animal was also significantly decreased (Fig. 5, F and G). Eosinophils failed to infiltrate into the areas where dermal TRMs were absent, even where many viable parasites were observed (Fig. 5B; areas 1 and 2 demarcated by dotted line).

We confirmed the interaction between eosinophils and dermal TRMs using high-resolution confocal microscopy on infected ear sections. Whereas 91% of eosinophils were associated with dermal TRMs in WT mice after infection, this association was significantly decreased to 47% in eoCre il4/13f/f mice (fig. S5A). As observed by intravital microscopy, the eosinophils infiltrating the dermis in eoCre il4/13f/f mice were smaller in volume and more spherical in shape compared with those in WT mice (fig. S5B).

Dermal TRMs from infected mice with selective deficiency in eosinophil IL-4/13 exhibit proinflammatory transcriptional profiles

We used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to identify global changes in the transcriptomes of dermal TRMs comparing cells recovered from WT and eoCre il4/13f/f mice during infection. At day 12 p.i., lack of localized production of IL-4/13 by eosinophils induced a marked alteration of dermal TRMs gene expression, with 516 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) significantly up- or down-regulated compared with WT mice (Fig. 6A and table S1). Gene ontology (GO) analysis was used to identify cellular processes that were altered in the dermal TRMs as a consequence of their lack of direct or indirect exposure to IL-4/13 from eosinophils. DEGs more than 1.5-fold, either up- or down-regulated, were used as inputs for the GO analysis, and the enriched categories are ranked according to adjusted P value (cutoff of <0.05; table S2). Note that there are only three GO categories enriched among genes that were down-regulated in dermal TRMs from infected eoCre il4/13f/f mice, two of which comprise redundant gene sets, and all have weaker P values than each of the 26 up-regulated GO-enriched categories. The linkages of the biological GO terms and assigned genes of the three down-regulated and top eight up-regulated categories are depicted as a network (Fig. 6B). Within the up-regulated network, most of the overrepresented genes are related to proinflammatory molecules and signaling pathways, including Tnf, Il6, Il18, IL1b, Il18r1, Nlrp3, Bcl3, Relb, Cd14, Ccl4, and Prdx1. The genes within the down-regulated categories included Ccl24 along with genes associated with anti-inflammatory functions, including Ccl17, Ptger4, and Fcer1g. Other genes related to M2 polarization but not assigned to these particular GO categories, including IL13ra, Cd209, Tfam, Tfrc, and Rora, were also significantly down-regulated in the dermal TRMs from the eoCre il4/13f/f mice (table S1).

Fig. 6 Dermal TRMs from infected eoCre il4/13f/f mice show proinflammatory transcriptional profiles compared with dermal TRMs from infected WT mice.

(A) Heat map displaying scaled fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads mapped (FPKM) expression values of DEGs of dermal TRMs from L. major infected WT and eoCre il4/13f/f mice. DEGs with absolute fold change of >1.5 and P < 0.05 (total 516 genes) are selected. Genes (row) and samples (column) are clustered using hierarchical clustering based on Pearson correlation distance. (B) Visualization of results from gene set enrichment analysis using preranked selected genes (274 up-regulated and 242 down-regulated DEGs are used). Gene concept network depicts the linkages of genes and biological GO terms as a network. The size of GO terms (gray) represents the number of genes connected, and the color of each genes indicates rank scores (from −4.79 to 4.79): up-regulated (red) and down-regulated (blue) in dermal TRMs of eoCre il4/13f/f compared with WT mice. NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; NIK, NF-κB–inducing kinase; IFN-γ, interferon-γ. (C) Venn diagram (top) shows 37 overlapping genes between DEGs from IL-4/13–treated versus nontreated BMDMs and from dermal TRMs of WT versus eoCre il4/13f/f mice. Heat maps display the differentially expressed values of the overlapping genes from in vitro BMDM on the left [log2(fold change)] and in vivo dermal TRMs from WT versus eoCre il4/13f/f mice on the right (FPKM with row z score). Genes with the same expression pattern between in vitro BMDM and in vivo dermal TRMs are highlighted in red (up) or blue (down) boxes. (D) Plot of upstream regulators predicted using IPA. The 516 DEGs identified between dermal TRMs of infected eoCre il4/13f/f versus WT mice were used as input. Only regulators in the “cytokine” molecular type were selected from the results and used for visualization. Regulators with activation z score (>2 or <−2, respectively, with 97.72% confidence) and P value of overlap (<0.05) are considered significantly activated (red) or inhibited (blue) in dermal TRMs from eoCre il4/13f/f mice versus WT mice.

We also compared DEGs of dermal TRMs recovered from infected WT versus eoCre il4/13f/f mice with previously reported DEGs from IL-4/13–treated versus nontreated BMDM in vitro (28). The vast majority of the DEGs were not shared, a finding consistent with the lack of overlap between the transcriptomes of adipose TRMs and those of BM-derived, classically activated M1 or M2 macrophages generated in vitro (Fig. 6C). Nonetheless, the differential expression of certain classical M2 markers, such as Chil3 and Retnla, were confined to the IL-4/13–stimulated BMDMs (28). In addition, we performed ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) to predict upstream regulators. An overlap P value was computed on the basis of the significant overlap between the 516 DEGs and known targets of the regulator. The activation z score was used to make predictions. Critically, IL-4 was identified as the upstream cytokine regulator predicted to be the most inhibited in our dataset (Fig. 6D). In contrast, proinflammatory and monocyte chemoattractants such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-1β, cxc chemokine ligand 2/3 (CXCL2/3), and CCL2 were identified as activated upstream regulators, consistent with the increased infiltration of inflammatory monocytes in the eoCre IL4/13f/f mice (Fig. 2G). Collectively, these data strongly support a role for IL-4/13 from eosinophils not only to induce the local proliferation of dermal TRMs but also to actively maintain their M2-like state during L. major infection.

Eosinophil IL-4 regulates CCL24 expression and proliferation of peritoneal macrophages during experimental Ascaris infection

To evaluate the significance of IL-4–CCL24–mediated interaction between TRMs and eosinophils in other tissue pathologies, we used Ascaris suum, a helminth infection model in the peritoneum that promotes a local eosinophilia (29). Peritoneal fluid from naïve animals already contained a significant amount of CCL24 (300 to 500 pg/ml), an underestimate considering that the fluid was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) used to harvest the peritoneal cells (Fig. 7, A and C). A single intraperitoneal injection of live Ascaris eggs induced a large amount of CCL24 (1 to 3 ng/ml) that was significantly reduced in anti–IL-4–treated mice (Fig. 7A) and in eoCre il4/13f/f mice lacking IL-4 production from eosinophils (Fig. 7C). As expected, marked accumulation of peritoneal eosinophils accompanied the increased CCL24 production after Ascaris infection that was ablated by anti–IL-4 treatment (Fig. 7B). The number of peritoneal macrophages was also decreased after IL-4 neutralization, a result consistent with the IL-4–driven, local proliferation of peritoneal macrophages in Brugia malayi, another tissue-invasive nematode (13). Moreover, both CCL24 neutralization and selective deficiency of IL-4 from eosinophils strongly reduced peritoneal eosinophil numbers (Fig. 7D). Both CCL24-neutralized WT and eoCre il4/13f/f mice, CCL24-neutralized or not, had a significantly decreased number of peritoneal TRMs compared with WT mice. Whereas fewer numbers of macrophages were recovered when comparing day 3 Ascaris-infected mice with naïve mice, their adhesion to the parasites and the “macrophage disappearance reaction” that is known to occur after acute inflammation may have made them more difficult to be recovered in the peritoneal lavage (30, 31). However, increased proliferation of the peritoneal macrophages was confirmed by both Ki67 staining and BrdU incorporation at 72 hours p.i., which was abrogated in the eoCre il4/13f/f mice (Fig. 7E).

Fig. 7 The IL-4–CCL24 axis mediates eosinophil influx and interaction with peritoneal macrophages in peritoneal Ascaris infection.

(A and C) Quantification of CCL24 from peritoneal fluids harvested from naïve mice (n = 3) or (A) mice (n = 6) infected intraperitoneally with 10,000 Ascaris eggs for 72 hours and treated with IL-4–neutralizing monoclonal Abs (mAbs) or control IgG or (C) WT and eoCre il4/13f/f–infected mice (n = 4). (B and D) The number of eosinophils and peritoneal macrophages in peritoneal fluids harvested from naïve mice (n = 3 to 4) or (B) Ascaris infected mice (n = 6) treated with IL-4–neutralizing mAbs or control IgG or (D) WT and eoCre il4/13f/f–infected mice treated with CCL24-neutralizing mAbs or control IgG (n = 4). (E) Ki67 expression or BrdU incorporation by dermal TRMs from naïve or infected WT and eoCre il4/13f/f mice with 10,000 Ascaris eggs for 72 hours (n = 4). (F) Representative ex vivo live imaging of fluorescence Ab-labeled SiglecF+ eosinophils and F4/80+ peritoneal macrophages from Ascaris-infected peritoneal isolates incubated with anti-CCL24 Ab or control IgG. Images in 1 and 2 show boxed areas at higher magnification. Arrowheads indicate eosinophilic materials transferred to or phagocytosed by F4/80+ peritoneal macrophages. Green-colored tracks show the paths followed by SiglecF+ eosinophils more than 4-hour imaging. (G) Eosinophil average speed of movement and migration distance were analyzed from live imaging represented in (F). (H) Quantification of CCL24 released from various TRMs sorted from naïve animals (n = 2 to 3) and cultured for 3 days in vitro with indicated cytokines. N.D., not determined. (I) Comparison of CCL24 transcription from various immune cells published by ImmGen (32). The relative expression of CCL24 gene is shown as a heat map among the indicated populations. Each square represents either a specified subset of TRMs (top row) or populations of the specified cells isolated from different organs. Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001 by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (A to E) to compare two samples and by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest compared with naïve (A to C) and IgG (G). Data are representative of two (A to E and H) or four (F) independent experiments.

To visualize the association of peritoneal TRMs and eosinophils during Ascaris infection, we performed ex vivo live imaging of peritoneal cells harvested from infected mice with or without CCL24 neutralization (Fig. 7F and movies S13 and S14). We observed clusters of closely interacting cells containing F4/80+ peritoneal macrophages and eosinophils, which showed minimal motility. Of note, cellular material from eosinophils seemed to be directly transferred to or taken up by peritoneal macrophages during their close interaction (Fig. 7F, insets 1 and 2. and movies S15 and S16). In contrast, no cluster of cells was formed after CCL24 neutralization, and eosinophils showed increased migration without interaction with peritoneal macrophages (Fig. 7, F and G).

To determine whether peritoneal TRMs, as well as TRMs from other tissues, produce CCL24 in response to IL-4/10, we sorted TRMs from various tissues and stimulated them with IL-4 and/or IL-10 (Fig. 7H). Resident macrophages recovered from the peritoneum, lung, liver, and adipose tissue all produced a large amount of CCL24 in response to IL-4/10 stimulation. IL-4 alone was sufficient to induce CCL24 expression in large peritoneal macrophages and Kupffer cells. In contrast, red pulp macrophages from the spleen failed to produce CCL24 under any condition tested.

Last, we compared CCL24 mRNA expression from gene expression profiles of various hematopoietic populations compiled in the ImmGen RNA-seq database (32). Ccl24 expression is restricted to TRMs, including peritoneal and adipose TRMs (Fig. 7I).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate the mechanisms by which the number and activation program of M2-like dermal TRMs are maintained during strong TH1-oriented immunity against cutaneous infection with L. major. Using BM chimeras and conditional knockout mice, innate cells and specifically eosinophils were identified as the main producers of IL-4 required to maintain the population size and M2-like properties of dermal TRMs during infection. In turn, IL-4–stimulated dermal TRMs, in concert with IL-10, released a large amount of CCL24 to sustain eosinophil influx. Intravital imaging of eosinophil behavior in the skin revealed an intimate association between dermal TRMs and infiltrating eosinophils, ensuring highly localized delivery of IL-4 during TH1 inflammation.

Although the role of IL-4 produced by innate cells has been mostly studied in the context of TH2 cell differentiation (33, 34), innate sources of IL-4 acting on macrophages have also been described. Basophils were reported to provide IL-4 required for the local proliferation of monocyte-derived macrophages that replaced Kupffer cells lost during bacterial infection (35). In the skin, Ly6C+CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes have been shown to differentiate into M2-like macrophages under the influence of basophil-derived IL-4 after helminth infection or allergen challenge (36, 37). Eosinophils were also found to play an important role in maintaining alternatively activated macrophages in adipose tissue through an IL-4–dependent process (16). The later studies reported very small numbers of adipose- and lung-resident eosinophils producing IL-4. We also found that only a small percentage of eosinophils were identified as active secretors of IL-4. Other cells identified as active IL-4 secretors using the reporter mice were CD90.2+CD11b−CD3−, most likely ILC2s, as well as basophils, and these cells likely contributed to the localized IL-4 production. The role of eosinophils in providing IL-4 to maintain the M2-like dermal TRMs is supported by the enhanced resistance to infection, accompanied by the reduced numbers of dermal TRMs, in anti-SiglecF–treated, IL-5 knockout, and most critically in eoCre il4/13f/f mice lacking IL-4 production from eosinophils. The data support a model whereby the anti-inflammatory programs of dermal TRMs in steady-state conditions, linked to their ontogeny and homeostatic cues from tissue microenvironments, are actively maintained by IL-4–producing eosinophils over the course of infection in the TH1 immune environment of the L. major–loaded dermis, as evidenced by a shift to a predominant proinflammatory transcriptional profile in dermal TRMs from eoCre il4/13f/f mice. By IPA, IL-4 was predicted as the key upstream cytokine regulator whose inhibition/absence could best explain the expression pattern of these cells. An increased infiltration of Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes was observed in the Leishmania-infected eoCre il4/13f/f mice, consistent with the up-regulated expression of CCL3/4 [macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α) and MIP1β] on the dermal TRMs from these mice, known chemoattractants for monocytes expressing CCR1/5 (38). The increased number of monocytes and monocyte-derived cells likely contributes to the improved control of infection in the eoCre il4/13f/f mice, as infection of these cells is associated with up-regulated inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and acquired resistance in L. major–infected mice (11, 39, 40).

The close physical proximity of eosinophils and dermal TRMs suggests highly localized delivery of IL-4. In live cell imaging of peritoneal cells recovered from Ascaris-infected animals, we observed that eosinophils directly transferred cellular material to peritoneal TRMs. Considering that eosinophils-derived cytokines are presynthesized and can be released by several distinct pathways from their stores within intracellular granules (41), the exact mechanism of IL-4 delivery to TRMs remains to be elucidated. Our studies provide clear evidence that the intimate physical association between eosinophils and TRMs is mediated by CCL24 (eotaxin-2) produced by dermal TRMs. More than 80% of eosinophils colocalized with dermal TRMs, and both the duration of contact between these cells and their areas of colocalization were significantly reduced after CCL24 neutralization. We show that dermal TRMs were the near exclusive producers of CCL24 among the various innate and adaptive populations in the skin. Even heavily parasitized areas had no eosinophil infiltration unless populated by dermal TRMs. In addition, eosinophils colocalized with dermal TRMs in a naïve animal, with CCL24 neutralization significantly reducing the number of eosinophils in the steady-state dermis, consistent with the previously described absence of eosinophils in naïve skin of ccr3−/− mice, lacking the receptor for CCL24 (42). Last, we could observe a similar requirement for eosinophil-derived IL-4 for the up-regulation of CCL24 secretion, which mediates the peritoneal eosinophilia observed in an Ascaris infection model. Ex vivo live imaging of peritoneal cells harvested from infected mice revealed clusters of interacting eosinophils and macrophages that were absent when CCL24 was neutralized. Two recent reports describe macrophages producing CCL24 in other tissue pathologies, including alveolar macrophages in lung melanoma and cardiac macrophages in myocarditis (43, 44).

We show that, in addition to IL-4, IL-10 was required for optimal secretion of CCL24 by dermal TRMs, consistent with the synergistic effects of these cytokines on induction of CCL24 production by BMDM in vitro (23) and the notable loss of dermal TRMs in mice lacking both IL-4 and IL-10 (11). We have not addressed the specific cellular source of the IL-10 that induces CCL24 expression in the dermal TRMs. IVM studies using IL-10 reporter mice are planned to help address this question. It should also be noted that as the phenotypes in the eoCre il4/13f/f mice were only partial with respect to infection outcome and loss of dermal TRMs, other sources of IL-4 likely play a role. Nonetheless, because macrophages in the peritoneum, lungs, liver, and adipose tissue all secreted high levels of CCL24 in response to IL-4/10, it would appear that resident macrophages in many different inflammatory settings can be conditioned by a common pathway to promote cooperative interactions with eosinophils required for their maintenance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

The goal of these studies was to demonstrate how dermal TRMs maintain the population size and M2-like characteristics during classical TH1 immune response against L. major infection. We compared the population size and transcriptional profiles of dermal TRMs between WT and eoCre IL4/13f/f mice. Animals were randomly assigned to different experimental groups. The sample size and reproducibility of experiments are specified in each figure legend. Sample measurements were blinded during experiments or analysis.

Mice

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Taconic Farms. C57BL/6 CD45.1+ or CD45.2+ rag1−/− mice, C57BL/6 il4−/− mice, and C57BL/6 Lyz2GFP mice were obtained through a supply contract between the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Taconic Farms. ROSA26-LSL-tdTomato mice (also known as Ai14) mice and Actb-DsRed.T3 were purchased from the Jackson laboratory. H. Rosenburg (NIAID) provided C57BL/6 il5−/− mice. eoCre mice, originally developed by Doyle et al. (45), were obtained from Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ and crossed with ROSA26-LSL-tdTomato mice to generate eosinophil-specific fluorescent reporter animals (27). eoCre il4/13f/f mice with selective deficiency of IL-4/13 in eosinophils (25, 26) were also obtained from Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. All of the mice used in these studies were female, 6 to 8 weeks old, and were bred and/or maintained in the NIAID animal care facility under specific pathogen–free conditions. They were used under a study protocol approved by the NIAID Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number LPD 68E). All aspects of the use of animals in this research were monitored for compliance with The Animal Welfare Act, the PHS Policy, the U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

In vivo injections

Manocept Alexa 488 or Cy5 (Navidea Biopharmaceuticals) is a fluorescently labeled derivative of Food and Drug Administration–approved 99mTc-Tilmanocept targeting mannose receptor. Naïve mice were intravenously injected with 25 μg of Manocept with 20 μg of anti-CD31 Abs (clone no. 390, Invitrogen) in total volume not to exceed 100 μl per mouse during IVM. For eosinophil depletion, animals were intraperitoneally injected with 15 μg of SiglecF Abs (clone no. 238047, R&D Systems) at day 2 p.i. and every 2 days. In vivo neutralization of CCL24 was carried out by intraperitoneal administration of 100 μg of monoclonal CCL24 Abs (clone no. 106521, R&D Systems) every day for 3 days beginning 1 day before L. major or Ascaris infection.

L. major and A. suum infection

The LmSd (MHOM/SN/74/SD) was maintained as follows: Promastigotes were grown at 26°C in M199/S, medium 199 supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Gemini Bio-Products), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), 2 mM l-glutamine, 40 mM Hepes, 0.1 mM adenine (in 50 mM Hepes), hemin (5 mg/ml; in 50% triethanolamine), and 6-biotin (1 mg/ml). Parasites expressing a red fluorescent protein (RFP) (LmSd-RFP) were grown using the identical culture medium supplemented with geneticin (50 μg/ml; G418, Gibco, Woodland, CA). Infective stage, metacyclic promastigotes were isolated from stationary cultures (5 to 6 days) by density gradient centrifugation, as previously described (46). Mice were then inoculated with metacyclic promastigotes in the ear dermis or footpad by intradermal or subcutaneous injection, respectively, in a volume of 10 μl. Lesion development was monitored weekly by measuring the diameter of the ear nodule with a direct-reading vernier caliper (Thomas Scientific). Lesion pathology was also evaluated and scored as follows: 0, no ulceration; 1, ulcer; 2, half ear eroded; 3, ear completely eroded.

For intraperitoneal inoculation of A. suum, live eggs were isolated from adult female uteri through gentle mechanical maceration, purified by straining, and cultured to embryonation in 0.2 M H2SO4 for 100 days, which corresponds to the peak of larvae infectivity as described (47). The fully embryonated eggs (containing the L3 infective stages) were used for experimental infections. Mice were inoculated through the intraperitoneal route with 10,000 fully embryonated eggs to induce a local eosinophilia, as previously demonstrated (29). Three days p.i., the peritoneal cavity cells and lavage were collected.

Processing of ear tissues and evaluation of L. major parasite burden

Ear tissue was prepared as previously described (48). Briefly, the two sheets of infected ear dermis were separated, deposited in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing Liberase TL-purified enzyme blend (0.2 mg/ml; Roche Diagnostics) and incubated for 1.5 hours at 37°C. Digested tissue was processed in a tissue homogenizer for 3.5 min (Medimachine, Becton Dickinson) and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (Falcon Products) to obtain single-cell suspension. Parasite titrations were performed as previously described (49). Briefly, tissue homogenates were serially diluted in 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates containing 100 μl of M199/S. The number of viable parasites in each ear was determined from the highest dilution at which promastigotes could be grown out after 7 to 10 days of incubation at 26°C.

Isolation of mouse peritoneal cells

Ascaris-infected mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1 ml of PBS. After injection, the peritoneum was gently massaged to dislodge any attached cells into the PBS solution. Cell suspension in PBS was collected with 25-gauge needle. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected for assays, and cells from the first wash were combined with the second lavage with 3 ml of PBS.

Detection of CCL24 levels by ELISA

CCL24 levels in the peritoneal lavage of Ascaris-inoculated mice were quantified by ELISA kits purchased from R&D Systems Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). All assays were performed according to the manufacturers’ protocols.

Immunolabeling and flow cytometry analysis

Detailed methods for the surface and intracellular cytokine staining of ear dermal cells for flow cytometry analysis are described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

BMDM- and BM-derived eosinophil generation, infection, and in vitro assays

Isolated femurs and tibia were flushed with PBS, and for BMDM differentiation, precursor cells were cultured in complete RPMI supplemented with 30% L929 cell-conditioned medium. The media were changed every 2 days thereafter. After 7-day culture, mature BMDMs were harvested by washing with cold PBS, incubating on ice for 15 min, and pipetting extensively. BMDMs were plated at 5 × 105 per well onto 24-well plates in AIM V serum-free media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with IL-4, IL-10, or IL-13 (10 ng/ml) with or without purified metacyclic promastigotes. After 3-day culture, supernatants were harvested and assayed with Quantibody mouse chemokine array Q1 (RayBiotech). For eosinophil differentiation, precursor cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s media containing GlutaMAX (Life Technologies), 10% FCS (HyClone), 2 mM l-glutamine (Life Technologies), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies), and stem cell factor (SCF; 50 ng/ml; Peprotech) (50). On day 4, the media were replaced with fresh complete media containing murine IL-5 (10 ng/ml; Peprotech). Media with IL-5 were changed every 2 days thereafter until harvesting fully differentiated eosinophils on day 14.

Eosinophil transwell migration assay

BMDMs were plated 1 × 105 per well to lower wells of HTS Transwell 96-well plates (Corning) and stimulated with IL-4, IL-10, or IL-13 (10 ng/ml) in the presence of anti-CCL24 Ab or isotype control (R&D Systems). After 72 hours, 2 × 105 BM-derived eosinophils were added to the upper wells and then incubated for 90 min at 37°C. Eosinophil migration was normalized to the respective assays having only IL-4, IL-10, or IL-13 cytokines without BMDMs to exclude chemotactic effect of cytokines.

Confocal microscopy, live cell imaging, and intravital microscopy

Detailed methods for immunostaining and confocal microscopy of cryostat sections of infected ears, for live cell imaging of BMDM cocultured with eosinophils in vitro, for imaging peritoneal cells ex vivo, and for noninvasive intravital imaging of the mouse ear are described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

BM chimeras

Recipient mice were irradiated with a single dose of 12.5 gray and reconstituted with donor BM. The harvested BM cells were intravenously injected at a dose of 2.5 × 106 cells per mouse in 100 μl of PBS. Animals were maintained on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Hi-Tech Pharmacal) antibiotic water for up to 5 weeks after irradiation. Hematopoietic reconstitution of all animals was verified by flow cytometry staining of congenic markers (CD45.1 and CD45.2).

RNA-seq and data analysis

Single-cell suspension and Ab staining were performed as described above except for addition of SUPERase•InTM Ribonuclease Inhibitor (100 U/ml; Thermo Fisher Scientific) to all of the tissue digestion/staining buffers to inhibit the strong ribonuclease activity in murine skin. One hundred dermal TRMs were directly sorted into lysis buffer included in the SMART-Seq V4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for sequencing (Takara), and complementary DNA was generated according to the commercial protocol. Detailed methods for library preparation, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis are described in the Supplementary Materials.

Statistical analyses

The differences in values obtained for two different groups were determined using nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. For comparisons of multiple groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunn’s posttest was used. Analyses were performed using Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

immunology.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/5/46/eaaz4415/DC1

Fig. S1. Gating strategy for eosinophils, PMNs, Ly6Chi monocytes, Ly6Cint/Ly6Clo moDCs, and dermal TRMs.

Fig. S2. Basophils and ILC2s produce IL-4.

Fig. S3. Dermal TRMs are the main producers of Ccl24 among dermal myeloid subsets.

Fig. S4. Eosinophils progressively infiltrate the L. major inoculation site.

Fig. S5. Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy on vertical ear sections of infected eoCre il4/13f/f and WT mice.

Table S1. List of DEGs.

Table S2. List of enriched GO categories.

Movie S1. Three-dimensional rotational confocal imaging of inoculation site and the area proximal to the inoculation site.

Movie S2. In vitro live imaging of eosinophils and IL-4/10–stimulated BMDMs with or without CCL24 neutralization.

Movie S3. Intravital imaging of perivascular dermal TRMs.

Movie S4. Intravital imaging of the active surface movements of dermal TRMs.

Movie S5. Intravital imaging of eosinophils with dermal TRMs in steady state.

Movie S6. Intravital imaging of eosinophils and dermal TRMs at 1 hour p.i. with or without CCL24 neutralization.

Movie S7. Intravital imaging of eosinophils and dermal TRMs at 3 days p.i. with or without CCL24 neutralization.

Movie S8. Ex vivo live imaging of eosinophils and peritoneal TRMs with or without CCL24 neutralization.

Movie S9. Ex vivo live imaging of eosinophils transferring cellular materials to peritoneal TRMs.

Data file S1. Raw data of figures.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  1. ↵
    1. L. C. Davies,
    2. S. J. Jenkins,
    3. J. E. Allen,
    4. P. R. Taylor
    , Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 14, 986–995 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. L. C. Davies,
    2. P. R. Taylor
    , Tissue-resident macrophages: Then and now. Immunology 144, 541–548 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. F. Ginhoux,
    2. M. Guilliams
    , Tissue-Resident Macrophage Ontogeny and Homeostasis. Immunity 44, 439–449 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. E. L. Gautier,
    2. T. Shay,
    3. J. Miller,
    4. M. Greter,
    5. C. Jakubzick,
    6. S. Ivanov,
    7. J. Helft,
    8. A. Chow,
    9. K. G. Elpek,
    10. S. Gordonov,
    11. A. R. Mazloom,
    12. A. Ma’ayan,
    13. W.-J. Chua,
    14. T. H. Hansen,
    15. S. J. Turley,
    16. M. Merad,
    17. G. J. Randolph; Immunological Genome Consortium
    , Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1118–1128 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Y. Lavin,
    2. D. Winter,
    3. R. Blecher-Gonen,
    4. E. David,
    5. H. Keren-Shaul,
    6. M. Merad,
    7. S. Jung,
    8. I. Amit
    , Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159, 1312–1326 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. T. A. Wynn,
    2. K. M. Vannella
    , Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity 44, 450–462 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. K. J. Lavine,
    2. S. Epelman,
    3. K. Uchida,
    4. K. J. Weber,
    5. C. G. Nichols,
    6. J. D. Schilling,
    7. D. M. Ornitz,
    8. G. J. Randolph,
    9. D. L. Mann
    , Distinct macrophage lineages contribute to disparate patterns of cardiac recovery and remodeling in the neonatal and adult heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 16029–16034 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. S. Epelman,
    2. K. J. Lavine,
    3. A. E. Beaudin,
    4. D. K. Sojka,
    5. J. A. Carrero,
    6. B. Calderon,
    7. T. Brija,
    8. E. L. Gautier,
    9. S. Ivanov,
    10. A. T. Satpathy,
    11. J. D. Schilling,
    12. R. Schwendener,
    13. I. Sergin,
    14. B. Razani,
    15. E. C. Forsberg,
    16. W. M. Yokoyama,
    17. E. R. Unanue,
    18. M. Colonna,
    19. G. J. Randolph,
    20. D. L. Mann
    , Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 40, 91–104 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. D. Rückerl,
    2. S. M. Campbell,
    3. S. Duncan,
    4. T. E. Sutherland,
    5. S. J. Jenkins,
    6. J. P. Hewitson,
    7. T. A. Barr,
    8. L. H. Jackson-Jones,
    9. R. M. Maizels,
    10. J. E. Allen
    , Macrophage origin limits functional plasticity in helminth-bacterial co-infection. PLOS Pathog. 13, e1006233 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. L. Huang,
    2. E. V. Nazarova,
    3. S. Tan,
    4. Y. Liu,
    5. D. G. Russell
    , Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo segregates with host macrophage metabolism and ontogeny. J. Exp. Med. 215, 1135–1152 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. S. H. Lee,
    2. M. Charmoy,
    3. A. Romano,
    4. A. Paun,
    5. M. M. Chaves,
    6. F. O. Cope,
    7. D. A. Ralph,
    8. D. L. Sacks
    , Mannose receptor high, M2 dermal macrophages mediate nonhealing Leishmania major infection in a Th1 immune environment. J. Exp. Med. 215, 357–375 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. S. J. Jenkins,
    2. D. Ruckerl,
    3. G. D. Thomas,
    4. J. P. Hewitson,
    5. S. Duncan,
    6. F. Brombacher,
    7. R. M. Maizels,
    8. D. A. Hume,
    9. J. E. Allen
    , IL-4 directly signals tissue-resident macrophages to proliferate beyond homeostatic levels controlled by CSF-1. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2477–2491 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. S. J. Jenkins,
    2. D. Ruckerl,
    3. P. C. Cook,
    4. L. H. Jones,
    5. F. D. Finkelman,
    6. N. van Rooijen,
    7. A. S. MacDonald,
    8. J. E. Allen
    , Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, Is a signature of TH2 inflammation. Science 332, 1284–1288 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. L. Bosurgi,
    2. Y. G. Cao,
    3. M. Cabeza-Cabrerizo,
    4. A. Tucci,
    5. L. D. Hughes,
    6. Y. Kong,
    7. J. S. Weinstein,
    8. P. Licona-Limon,
    9. E. T. Schmid,
    10. F. Pelorosso,
    11. N. Gagliani,
    12. J. E. Craft,
    13. R. A. Flavell,
    14. S. Ghosh,
    15. C. V. Rothlin
    , Macrophage function in tissue repair and remodeling requires IL-4 or IL-13 with apoptotic cells. Science 356, 1072–1076 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Y. Qiu,
    2. K. D. Nguyen,
    3. J. I. Odegaard,
    4. X. Cui,
    5. X. Tian,
    6. R. M. Locksley,
    7. R. D. Palmiter,
    8. A. Chawla
    , Eosinophils and type 2 cytokine signaling in macrophages orchestrate development of functional beige fat. Cell 157, 1292–1308 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. D. Wu,
    2. A. B. Molofsky,
    3. H.-E. Liang,
    4. R. R. Ricardo-Gonzalez,
    5. H. A. Jouihan,
    6. J. K. Bando,
    7. A. Chawla,
    8. R. M. Locksley
    , Eosinophils sustain adipose alternatively activated macrophages associated with glucose homeostasis. Science 332, 243–247 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. P. F. Weller,
    2. L. A. Spencer
    , Functions of tissue-resident eosinophils. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 746–760 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. J. J. Lee,
    2. E. A. Jacobsen,
    3. S. I. Ochkur,
    4. M. P. McGarry,
    5. R. M. Condjella,
    6. A. D. Doyle,
    7. H. Luo,
    8. K. R. Zellner,
    9. C. A. Protheroe,
    10. L. Willetts,
    11. W. E. LeSuer,
    12. D. C. Colbert,
    13. R. A. Helmers,
    14. P. Lacy,
    15. R. Moqbel,
    16. N. A. Lee
    , Human versus mouse eosinophils: "That which we call an eosinophil, by any other name would stain as red". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 130, 572–584 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. J. C. Nussbaum,
    2. S. J. Van Dyken,
    3. J. von Moltke,
    4. L. E. Cheng,
    5. A. Mohapatra,
    6. A. B. Molofsky,
    7. E. E. Thornton,
    8. M. F. Krummel,
    9. A. Chawla,
    10. H.-E. Liang,
    11. R. M. Locksley
    , Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature 502, 245–248 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. A. Mishra,
    2. S. P. Hogan,
    3. J. J. Lee,
    4. P. S. Foster,
    5. M. E. Rothenberg
    , Fundamental signals that regulate eosinophil homing to the gastrointestinal tract. J. Clin. Invest. 103, 1719–1727 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. J. D. Turner,
    2. N. Pionnier,
    3. J. Furlong-Silva,
    4. H. Sjoberg,
    5. S. Cross,
    6. A. Halliday,
    7. A. F. Guimaraes,
    8. D. A. N. Cook,
    9. A. Steven,
    10. N. Van Rooijen,
    11. J. E. Allen,
    12. S. J. Jenkins,
    13. M. J. Taylor
    , Interleukin-4 activated macrophages mediate immunity to filarial helminth infection by sustaining CCR3-dependent eosinophilia. PLOS Pathog. 14, e1006949 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. K. Watanabe,
    2. P. J. Jose,
    3. S. M. Rankin
    , Eotaxin-2 generation is differentially regulated by lipopolysaccharide and IL-4 in monocytes and macrophages. J. Immunol. 168, 1911–1918 (2002).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. N. Makita,
    2. Y. Hizukuri,
    3. K. Yamashiro,
    4. M. Murakawa,
    5. Y. Hayashi
    , IL-10 enhances the phenotype of M2 macrophages induced by IL-4 and confers the ability to increase eosinophil migration. Int. Immunol. 27, 131–141 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. K. Mohrs,
    2. A. E. Wakil,
    3. N. Killeen,
    4. R. M. Locksley,
    5. M. Mohrs
    , A two-step process for cytokine production revealed by IL-4 dual-reporter mice. Immunity 23, 419–429 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. A. D. Doyle,
    2. M. Mukherjee,
    3. W. E. LeSuer,
    4. T. B. Bittner,
    5. S. M. Pasha,
    6. J. J. Frere,
    7. J. L. Neely,
    8. J. A. Kloeber,
    9. K. P. Shim,
    10. S. I. Ochkur,
    11. T. Ho,
    12. S. Svenningsen,
    13. B. L. Wright,
    14. M. A. Rank,
    15. J. J. Lee,
    16. P. Nair,
    17. E. A. Jacobsen
    , Eosinophil-derived IL-13 promotes emphysema. Eur. Respir. J. 53, 1801291 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. D. Voehringer,
    2. D. Wu,
    3. H.-E. Liang,
    4. R. M. Locksley
    , Efficient generation of long-distance conditional alleles using recombineering and a dual selection strategy in replicate plates. BMC Biotechnol. 9, 69 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. A. Chojnacki,
    2. K. Wojcik,
    3. B. Petri,
    4. G. Aulakh,
    5. E. A. Jacobsen,
    6. W. E. LeSuer,
    7. P. Colarusso,
    8. K. D. Patel
    , Intravital imaging allows real-time characterization of tissue resident eosinophils. Commun. Biol. 2, 181 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. C. P. Hans,
    2. N. Sharma,
    3. S. Sen,
    4. S. Zeng,
    5. R. Dev,
    6. Y. Jiang,
    7. A. Mahajan,
    8. T. Joshi
    , Transcriptomics Analysis Reveals New Insights into the Roles of Notch1 Signaling on Macrophage Polarization. Sci. Rep. 9, 7999 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. G. T. Archer,
    2. N. Coulits,
    3. J. Jindra,
    4. J. E. Robson
    , Eosinophilia, mast cell hyperplasia and antibody production in rats following an intraperitoneal injection of Ascaris cuticle including in-vitro studies of immune eosinophil granule lysis. Pathology 17, 101–107 (1985).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. E. L. Jeska
    , Mouse peritoneal exudate cell reactions to parasitic worms. I. Cell adhesion reactions. Immunology 16, 761–771 (1969).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. M. W. Barth,
    2. J. A. Hendrzak,
    3. M. J. Melnicoff,
    4. P. S. Morahan
    , Review of the macrophage disappearance reaction. J. Leukoc. Biol. 57, 361–367 (1995).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. T. S. Heng,
    2. M. W. Painter; Immunological Genome Project Consortium
    , The Immunological Genome Project: Networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1091–1094 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. L. A. Spencer,
    2. P. F. Weller
    , Eosinophils and Th2 immunity: Contemporary insights. Immunol. Cell Biol. 88, 250–256 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. W. E. Paul,
    2. J. Zhu
    , How are TH2-type immune responses initiated and amplified? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 225–235 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. C. Blériot,
    2. T. Dupuis,
    3. G. Jouvion,
    4. G. Eberl,
    5. O. Disson,
    6. M. Lecuit
    , Liver-resident macrophage necroptosis orchestrates type 1 microbicidal inflammation and type-2-mediated tissue repair during bacterial infection. Immunity 42, 145–158 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. M. Egawa,
    2. K. Mukai,
    3. S. Yoshikawa,
    4. M. Iki,
    5. N. Mukaida,
    6. Y. Kawano,
    7. Y. Minegishi,
    8. H. Karasuyama
    , Inflammatory monocytes recruited to allergic skin acquire an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype via basophil-derived interleukin-4. Immunity 38, 570–580 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. K. Obata-Ninomiya,
    2. K. Ishiwata,
    3. H. Tsutsui,
    4. Y. Nei,
    5. S. Yoshikawa,
    6. Y. Kawano,
    7. Y. Minegishi,
    8. N. Ohta,
    9. N. Watanabe,
    10. H. Kanuka,
    11. H. Karasuyama
    , The skin is an important bulwark of acquired immunity against intestinal helminths. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2583–2595 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. S. D. Wolpe,
    2. G. Davatelis,
    3. B. Sherry,
    4. B. Beutler,
    5. D. G. Hesse,
    6. H. T. Nguyen,
    7. L. L. Moldawer,
    8. C. F. Nathan,
    9. S. F. Lowry,
    10. A. Cerami
    , Macrophages secrete a novel heparin-binding protein with inflammatory and neutrophil chemokinetic properties. J. Exp. Med. 167, 570–581 (1988).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. S. Stenger,
    2. H. Thüring,
    3. M. Röllinghoff,
    4. C. Bogdan
    , Tissue expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase is closely associated with resistance to Leishmania major. J. Exp. Med. 180, 783–793 (1994).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. C. De Trez,
    2. S. Magez,
    3. S. Akira,
    4. B. Ryffel,
    5. Y. Carlier,
    6. E. Muraille
    , iNOS-producing inflammatory dendritic cells constitute the major infected cell type during the chronic Leishmania major infection phase of C57BL/6 resistant mice. PLOS Pathog. 5, e1000494 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. L. A. Spencer,
    2. K. Bonjour,
    3. R. C. N. Melo,
    4. P. F. Weller
    , Eosinophil secretion of granule-derived cytokines. Front. Immunol. 5, 496 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. W. Ma,
    2. P. J. Bryce,
    3. A. A. Humbles,
    4. D. Laouini,
    5. A. Yalcindag,
    6. H. Alenius,
    7. D. S. Friend,
    8. H. C. Oettgen,
    9. C. Gerard,
    10. R. S. Geha
    , CCR3 is essential for skin eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of allergic skin inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 109, 621–628 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. M. Cheng,
    2. Y. Chen,
    3. L. Wang,
    4. W. Chen,
    5. L. Yang,
    6. G. Shen,
    7. T. Xu,
    8. G. Shen,
    9. Z. Tian,
    10. S. Hu
    , Commensal microbiota maintains alveolar macrophages with a low level of CCL24 production to generate anti-metastatic tumor activity. Sci. Rep. 7, 7471 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. N. L. Diny,
    2. X. Hou,
    3. J. G. Barin,
    4. G. Chen,
    5. M. V. Talor,
    6. J. Schaub,
    7. S. D. Russell,
    8. K. Klingel,
    9. N. R. Rose,
    10. D. Čiháková
    , Macrophages and cardiac fibroblasts are the main producers of eotaxins and regulate eosinophil trafficking to the heart. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 2749–2760 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. A. D. Doyle,
    2. E. A. Jacobsen,
    3. S. I. Ochkur,
    4. L. Willetts,
    5. K. Shim,
    6. J. Neely,
    7. J. Kloeber,
    8. W. E. LeSuer,
    9. R. S. Pero,
    10. P. Lacy,
    11. R. Moqbel,
    12. N. A. Lee,
    13. J. J. Lee
    , Homologous recombination into the eosinophil peroxidase locus generates a strain of mice expressing Cre recombinase exclusively in eosinophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 94, 17–24 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. G. F. Späth,
    2. S. M. Beverley
    , A lipophosphoglycan-independent method for isolation of infective Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by density gradient centrifugation. Exp. Parasitol. 99, 97–103 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. P. H. Gazzinelli-Guimarães,
    2. A. C. Gazzinelli-Guimarães,
    3. F. N. Silva,
    4. V. L. T. Mati,
    5. L. de Carvalho Dhom-Lemos,
    6. F. S. Barbosa,
    7. L. S. A. Passos,
    8. S. Gaze,
    9. C. M. Carneiro,
    10. D. C. Bartholomeu,
    11. L. L. Bueno,
    12. R. T. Fujiwara
    , Parasitological and immunological aspects of early Ascaris spp. infection in mice. Int. J. Parasitol. 43, 697–706 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Y. Belkaid,
    2. S. Mendez,
    3. R. Lira,
    4. N. Kadambi,
    5. G. Milon,
    6. D. Sacks
    , A natural model of Leishmania major infection reveals a prolonged "silent" phase of parasite amplification in the skin before the onset of lesion formation and immunity. J. Immunol. 165, 969–977 (2000).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Y. Belkaid,
    2. S. Kamhawi,
    3. G. Modi,
    4. J. Valenzuela,
    5. N. Noben-Trauth,
    6. E. Rowton,
    7. J. Ribeiro,
    8. D. L. Sacks
    , Development of a natural model of cutaneous leishmaniasis: Powerful effects of vector saliva and saliva preexposure on the long-term outcome of Leishmania major infection in the mouse ear dermis. J. Exp. Med. 188, 1941–1953 (1998).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. K. L. Schollaert,
    2. M. R. Stephens,
    3. J. K. Gray,
    4. P. C. Fulkerson
    , Generation of eosinophils from cryopreserved murine bone marrow cells. PLOS ONE 9, e116141 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Acknowledgments: We thank O. Schwartz (NIAID) and S. Ganesan (NIAID) for the help with image acquisition and analysis and C. Eigsti (NIAID) for the help with the cell sorting. Funding: This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIAID, NIH. F.T.C. core funding is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (310030_18475/1). Author contributions: S.H.L. and D.L.S. designed the study. S.H.L., M.M.C., O.K., P.H.G.-G., B.K., G.P., K.P., and E.A.J. performed the experiments. S.H.L., D.L.S., P.H.G.-G., B.K., F.T.-C., T.B.N., and J.K. analyzed the data. S.H.L. and D.L.S. did the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: RNA-seq data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Sequence Read Archive and are available under accession number PRJNA565178. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions of the paper, including raw data, are present in the paper and the Supplementary Materials. eoCre and eoCre il4/13f/f mice are available upon request but are contingent upon approval of material transfer agreement by the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. Other material used in this study will be provided upon request.

Article Tools

My saved folders

Stay Connected to Science Immunology

Related Content

Similar Articles in:

Citing Articles in:

Navigate This Article